Skip to main content

AI Rankings

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K3: Scores, Price and Which to Choose

Side by side on every measure both models share: overall score, human votes, tests, price and context window. Close results are called too close to call.

Data updated

Read the model pages for the full picture: Claude Opus 4.6 and Kimi K3.

Side by side

A check mark shows the better side on each measure. Scores that are too close to call have no winner.
Claude Opus 4.6 compared with Kimi K3Claude Opus 4.6 against Kimi K3 on 12 measures. Claude Opus 4.6 is better on 3, Kimi K3 on 6, 3 are too close to call, 0 have no data for one side.
  • Claude Opus 4.6
  • Kimi K3
  1. Epoch Capabilities IndexToo close to call

    Combined score over many tests. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.

    Claude Opus 4.6:
    155.7
    Kimi K3:
    157.9
  2. Arena text ratingClaude Opus 4.6 leads

    Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.

    Claude Opus 4.6:
    Better: 1503
    Kimi K3:
    1487
  3. Arena coding ratingToo close to call

    Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.

    Claude Opus 4.6:
    1547
    Kimi K3:
    1539
  4. Arena web development ratingKimi K3 leads

    Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.

    Claude Opus 4.6:
    1546
    Kimi K3:
    Better: 1655
  5. ARC-AGI-2Claude Opus 4.6 leads

    Visual puzzles where the AI must work out a new rule from a few examples and apply it.

    Claude Opus 4.6:
    Better: 69.2%
    Kimi K3:
    60.4%
  6. SimpleBenchClaude Opus 4.6 leads

    Everyday common-sense and trick questions that most people answer correctly but AI models often get wrong.

    Claude Opus 4.6:
    Better: 67.6%
    Kimi K3:
    60.7%
  7. FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)Kimi K3 leads

    Original, very hard maths problems written by mathematicians.

    Claude Opus 4.6:
    66.0%
    Kimi K3:
    Better: 72.2%
  8. GPQA DiamondKimi K3 leads

    Very hard multiple-choice science questions in biology, physics and chemistry, written by experts and designed so a quick web search does not give the answer.

    Claude Opus 4.6:
    90.5%
    Kimi K3:
    Better: 93.1%
  9. OTIS Mock AIMEKimi K3 leads

    Maths competition problems in the style of the US AIME exam, from the 2024 and 2025 sets.

    Claude Opus 4.6:
    94.4%
    Kimi K3:
    Better: 97.2%
  10. SimpleQA VerifiedKimi K3 leads

    Short factual questions that each have one correct answer.

    Claude Opus 4.6:
    47.0%
    Kimi K3:
    Better: 50.6%
  11. Blended price per million tokensKimi K3 costs less

    Blended price: lower is better.

    Claude Opus 4.6:
    $10.00
    Kimi K3:
    Better: $6.00
  12. Context windowToo close to call

    How much text it can read at once.

    Claude Opus 4.6:
    1M tokens
    Kimi K3:
    1M tokens
Data updated 26 Oct 2026. Only measures that both models have are shown.

The numbers

Claude Opus 4.6 against Kimi K3, measure by measure. A check mark shows the better side.
MeasureClaude Opus 4.6Kimi K3
Epoch Capabilities IndexToo close to call155.7157.9
Arena text rating15031487
Arena coding ratingToo close to call15471539
Arena web development rating15461655
ARC-AGI-269.2%60.4%
SimpleBench67.6%60.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)66.0%72.2%
GPQA Diamond90.5%93.1%
OTIS Mock AIME94.4%97.2%
SimpleQA Verified47.0%50.6%
Blended price per million tokens$10.00$6.00
Context windowToo close to call1M tokens1M tokens

What it costs in everyday terms

Estimate for 100 chats of about 1,000 tokens in and 500 tokens back, from list prices. Your bill depends on how you use it.
100 chats with Claude Opus 4.6
$1.75
Blended price $10.00 per million tokens.
100 chats with Kimi K3
$1.05
Blended price $6.00 per million tokens.

Who should pick which

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 if these matter most

  • Arena text rating: 1503 against 1487
  • ARC-AGI-2: 69.2% against 60.4%
  • SimpleBench: 67.6% against 60.7%

Pick Kimi K3 if these matter most

  • Arena web development rating: 1655 against 1546
  • FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 72.2% against 66.0%
  • GPQA Diamond: 93.1% against 90.5%
  • OTIS Mock AIME: 97.2% against 94.4%
  • SimpleQA Verified: 50.6% against 47.0%
  • Blended price per million tokens: $6.00 against $10.00

Too close to call: Epoch Capabilities Index, Arena coding rating, Context window.

Scores come from tests and votes, not from your own work. Try both on a task you care about before you commit.

Questions about this comparison

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 scores higher on 5 of 10 shared quality measures, Claude Opus 4.6 on 3. 2 measures are too close to call. Kimi K3 costs about 40% less than Claude Opus 4.6 on a blended price of $6.00 against $10.00 per million tokens. Which one is better for you depends on your task and budget, so test both on your own work.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 is cheaper on blended price: $10.00 per million tokens for Claude Opus 4.6 against $6.00 for Kimi K3. For 100 chats of about 1,000 tokens in and 500 tokens back, that is about $1.75 for Claude Opus 4.6 and $1.05 for Kimi K3.
Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or Kimi K3?
On Arena coding rating they are too close to call (1547 and 1539).

Where this data comes from

  • Epoch AI: Benchmark data: Epoch AI, 'Capabilities & benchmarking', epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0). We match models across sources, rank them and show them in charts. Scores are not changed. Epoch AI does not endorse this site.
  • Arena (formerly LMArena): Human-preference ratings: Arena (arena.ai) leaderboard dataset, CC BY 4.0. We keep the latest published ratings, match them to models from other sources and rank them. Ratings are not changed. Arena does not endorse this site.
  • LiteLLM model price list: Prices and context windows: LiteLLM model price list (github.com/BerriAI/litellm, MIT licence). We use the model maker's own price entry when there is one. Prices change often, so always confirm on the maker's site before you buy.

Newest data on this page: 26 Oct 2026. Prices are list prices and change often, so confirm on the maker's site before you buy. Sponsors never change a score or an order. How we calculate this · Report a mistake

We use optional cookies for analytics and referral tracking. Learn more about our privacy policy