AI Prompts for Students

Use the attached math problem and my working. If a symbol, line or diagram is unclear, quote the ambiguous part and ask me to clarify; do not silently guess. First transcribe the problem and number my steps. Check each step against the previous one, preserving units, domains and conditions. Identify the first incorrect or unsupported step rather than only giving a final answer. Explain the specific rule involved and give one small hint, then wait for me to try again. If all steps are valid, explain how to verify the result independently. After I request the full correction, show a concise worked solution and substitute the result back into the original problem. Distinguish an arithmetic slip from a conceptual misunderstanding. Do not infer a learning ability or diagnosis from one attempt.

Build a revision calendar from these inputs: {{exams}}. Available time and unavailable dates: {{availability}}. Weak topics and existing commitments: {{priorities}}.
First reconcile dates and ask about any missing exam date or ambiguous timezone/date format. Calculate total study minutes available before each exam and show the arithmetic. Allocate short topic sessions, spaced revisits, practice under exam conditions and at least one buffer period. Prioritize weak high-weight topics only when weighting is supplied; otherwise mark it unknown. Do not schedule more minutes than available, duplicate time slots or promise a grade. Return a dated table [session, topic, minutes, task, observable completion], a workload summary and a recovery rule for missed sessions. Leave time to review errors rather than only reread notes. If the workload is impossible, explain the shortfall and offer a smaller plan.

Using only the selected notebook sources or attached documents, audit coverage of this research question. Ask me for the question and the source titles if they are not provided. Return one row per source: title, relevant passage or citation, contribution, conflicts with other sources, and whether it supports the proposed answer. Distinguish not retrieved from irrelevant: do not claim to have inspected a source you cannot access. Identify sources absent from the initial answer, then request a focused follow-up on those sources. Finish with a brief synthesis that keeps disagreements visible and a list of original passages I should open to verify. Never invent quotations, page numbers or references. If source coverage cannot be established, state the limitation.

Turn my study notes into a focused active-recall session.
Notes: {{notes}}
Level: {{level}}
Learning goal: {{goal}}
Available minutes: {{minutes}}
Create a short topic map, six recall questions, two application problems and an answer key separated from the questions. Use only the notes for factual answers and flag gaps. Include one misconception check and a simple revisit plan. Encourage me to answer before revealing explanations; do not substitute passive rereading for retrieval practice. Do not promise a grade or pretend to assess an answer I have not supplied.