AI Prompts for Resumes & Careers

Act as a Senior Executive Recruiter and Resume Writer. I need you to polish a specific bullet point on my resume to make it stand out to hiring managers while preserving the actual evidence supplied.
Context:
Target Role: {{role}}
My Draft Bullet: "{{draft}}"
Key Metrics/Results: {{evidence}}
Your Task:
Rewrite this bullet point using the STAR Method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) and Google’s XYZ Formula ("Accomplished [X] as measured by [Y], by doing [Z]").
Provide 3 distinct options:
Option 1: The "Data-Driven" Version
Focus heavily on the numbers, percentages, and hard ROI. Use strong action verbs like "Spearheaded," "Generated," or "Reduced."
Option 2: The "Leadership" Version
Focus on the soft skills, team management, and strategic impact (best for management roles).
Option 3: The "Problem Solver" Version
Focus on the challenge that was overcome and the efficiency gained.
Constraint:
Remove passive phrases like "Responsible for" or "Assisted with."
Keep each bullet under 2 lines.
Output in clean Markdown.

Preserve provided facts. Identify missing evidence and assumptions. Do not promise rankings, replies, hiring, perfect fidelity or measured performance without supporting tests.

Examine the attached job post, recruiter message and any supplied URL text. Redact personal identifiers in your response. Do not open attachments, run software, contact anyone or make payments. If text is unreadable, ask for a pasted copy.
Separate observed facts from concerns and unknowns. Check consistency of company name, email domain, role, location, hiring stages, payment requests, requests for sensitive data and pressure to move off established channels. Do not call a message genuine or fraudulent from wording alone. Return [observed detail, why it needs checking, independent verification step, safe next action]. Recommend navigating to the employer's official careers page independently rather than trusting embedded links. Draft a short clarification message requesting the official job listing and hiring contact. Finish with a pause decision if identity or payment details remain unverified. No invented registry checks.

Help me prepare a professional response to a job offer. Start by asking up to three questions about the written terms, the one or two changes I care about most, and my deadline or constraints. Wait for my answers. I may redact company and personal details.
After I reply, separate guaranteed base pay, variable compensation and non-cash terms; do not combine uncertain bonuses into guaranteed pay. Identify unclear terms and recommend questions rather than interpreting them as settled. Draft a 100–150-word reply that expresses interest, requests my prioritized change and gives a truthful rationale drawn only from my experience or supplied evidence. Provide a softer alternative and a short call outline. Do not invent competing offers, salary benchmarks, legal rights or leverage. If market research would change the request, mark it as a separate verification task. End with a before-send checklist and leave the decision with me.

Help me tell a credible portfolio story.
Project: {{project}}
My actual role: {{role}}
Constraints and process notes: {{process}}
Results and evidence: {{results}}
Write a structured case study: problem, contribution, constraints, decisions, result and lessons. Make my role distinct from the team’s. Use numbers only when provided and preserve their context. If outcomes were not measured, explain what was observed and what remains unknown. Add three suggested visuals with captions and questions to fill evidence gaps. Do not invent client praise, business impact, research participants or ownership.

Help me practice a job interview without inventing my experience. First ask for the role, job description, one genuine project and my desired interview length. Then ask one relevant question at a time, wait for my answer and follow up on missing evidence. After each answer give a short assessment of relevance, specificity and clarity, quoting the phrase that needs work. Suggest a stronger structure using only facts I supplied; label missing evidence rather than supplying invented metrics. Include one technical or situational question when the role warrants it. End with a three-item practice plan. Do not assess protected traits or guarantee hiring outcomes.