Find your AI advantage. Put it to work.

Create a concise research brief using only the supplied material.
Research question: {{question}}
Source excerpts with URLs and publication dates: {{sources}}
Decision context: {{decision context}}
Required freshness: {{freshness}}
Return the answer, evidence table, conflicting findings, confidence limits and next verification steps. Attach a source to each factual claim and distinguish reported facts from your inference. Do not invent citations or assume a source says more than the excerpt provides. If the material is too old or incomplete, mark the relevant question unanswered. End with a recommendation only if the evidence supports one.

Edit the draft in my attached document or the text I paste into this chat so it sounds like a thoughtful person with a specific point of view. If I also attach writing samples, use them as tone references while preserving the meaning of the draft. Return the revised draft, a short change log, and a list of claims that need evidence. Remove repetitive openings, filler, and vague abstractions. Prefer precise nouns, concrete examples, and varied natural sentence lengths. Preserve the facts, names, quotes, uncertainty, and material caveats. Do not add personal experiences, customer stories, or statistics. Infer the audience only when the material makes it clear; otherwise ask a concise question. If voice instructions conflict with factual clarity, keep clarity and explain the trade-off. If the draft is missing or unreadable, ask me for an accessible copy or pasted text before editing.

Map my transferable skills from my past work to a new career. Use only the facts I give and invent nothing.

Work I have done (tasks, not only job titles): {{past_work}}
Role I want to move into: {{target_role}}
What that role asks for (pasted from a job ad or job profile): {{target_requirements}}

First, turn my past work into a list of skills, each tied to a quoted note from me. Then build a table: Target requirement | My evidence (quoted) | Match | Plain wording for the new field | Honest gap or next step. Match must be DIRECT (same task, same kind of setting), TRANSFERABLE (a similar skill in a different setting; explain in one sentence why it carries over) or GAP (no evidence given).
Translate my old field's jargon into the new field's terms only where the meaning is the same, and flag any doubtful translation. For each gap, suggest one small real way to build or show the skill, such as a short course, volunteering or a practice project, without naming providers or promising outcomes. Ask me up to four questions if my notes are too thin. End with my three strongest points and three biggest gaps.