Skip to main content

AI Rankings

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4 Pro: Scores, Price and Which to Choose

Side by side on every measure both models share: overall score, human votes, tests, price and context window. Close results are called too close to call.

Data updated

Read the model pages for the full picture: Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.4 Pro.

Side by side

A check mark shows the better side on each measure. Scores that are too close to call have no winner.
Claude Opus 4.7 compared with GPT-5.4 ProClaude Opus 4.7 against GPT-5.4 Pro on 9 measures. Claude Opus 4.7 is better on 2, GPT-5.4 Pro on 5, 2 are too close to call, 0 have no data for one side.
  • Claude Opus 4.7
  • GPT-5.4 Pro
  1. Epoch Capabilities IndexToo close to call

    Combined score over many tests. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.

    Claude Opus 4.7:
    156.8
    GPT-5.4 Pro:
    159.6
  2. Humanity's Last ExamGPT-5.4 Pro leads

    A large set of very hard, expert-written questions across many subjects, built to stay difficult for top AI models.

    Claude Opus 4.7:
    36.2%
    GPT-5.4 Pro:
    Better: 44.3%
  3. ARC-AGI-2GPT-5.4 Pro leads

    Visual puzzles where the AI must work out a new rule from a few examples and apply it.

    Claude Opus 4.7:
    75.8%
    GPT-5.4 Pro:
    Better: 83.3%
  4. SimpleBenchGPT-5.4 Pro leads

    Everyday common-sense and trick questions that most people answer correctly but AI models often get wrong.

    Claude Opus 4.7:
    61.7%
    GPT-5.4 Pro:
    Better: 74.1%
  5. FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)GPT-5.4 Pro leads

    Original, very hard maths problems written by mathematicians.

    Claude Opus 4.7:
    70.2%
    GPT-5.4 Pro:
    Better: 82.5%
  6. GPQA DiamondGPT-5.4 Pro leads

    Very hard multiple-choice science questions in biology, physics and chemistry, written by experts and designed so a quick web search does not give the answer.

    Claude Opus 4.7:
    90.2%
    GPT-5.4 Pro:
    Better: 94.6%
  7. SimpleQA VerifiedClaude Opus 4.7 leads

    Short factual questions that each have one correct answer.

    Claude Opus 4.7:
    Better: 51.7%
    GPT-5.4 Pro:
    46.3%
  8. Blended price per million tokensClaude Opus 4.7 costs less

    Blended price: lower is better.

    Claude Opus 4.7:
    Better: $10.00
    GPT-5.4 Pro:
    $67.50
  9. Context windowToo close to call

    How much text it can read at once.

    Claude Opus 4.7:
    1M tokens
    GPT-5.4 Pro:
    1.1M tokens
Data updated 26 Oct 2026. Only measures that both models have are shown.

The numbers

Claude Opus 4.7 against GPT-5.4 Pro, measure by measure. A check mark shows the better side.
MeasureClaude Opus 4.7GPT-5.4 Pro
Epoch Capabilities IndexToo close to call156.8159.6
Humanity's Last Exam36.2%44.3%
ARC-AGI-275.8%83.3%
SimpleBench61.7%74.1%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)70.2%82.5%
GPQA Diamond90.2%94.6%
SimpleQA Verified51.7%46.3%
Blended price per million tokens$10.00$67.50
Context windowToo close to call1M tokens1.1M tokens

What it costs in everyday terms

Estimate for 100 chats of about 1,000 tokens in and 500 tokens back, from list prices. Your bill depends on how you use it.
100 chats with Claude Opus 4.7
$1.75
Blended price $10.00 per million tokens.
100 chats with GPT-5.4 Pro
$12
Blended price $67.50 per million tokens.

Who should pick which

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 if these matter most

  • SimpleQA Verified: 51.7% against 46.3%
  • Blended price per million tokens: $10.00 against $67.50

Pick GPT-5.4 Pro if these matter most

  • Humanity's Last Exam: 44.3% against 36.2%
  • ARC-AGI-2: 83.3% against 75.8%
  • SimpleBench: 74.1% against 61.7%
  • FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 82.5% against 70.2%
  • GPQA Diamond: 94.6% against 90.2%

Too close to call: Epoch Capabilities Index, Context window.

Scores come from tests and votes, not from your own work. Try both on a task you care about before you commit.

Go deeper

Claude Opus 4.7: full page

GPT-5.4 Pro: full page

Questions about this comparison

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 Pro?
GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on 5 of 7 shared quality measures, Claude Opus 4.7 on 1. 1 measure is too close to call. Claude Opus 4.7 costs about 85% less than GPT-5.4 Pro on a blended price of $10.00 against $67.50 per million tokens. Which one is better for you depends on your task and budget, so test both on your own work.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.7 is cheaper on blended price: $10.00 per million tokens for Claude Opus 4.7 against $67.50 for GPT-5.4 Pro. For 100 chats of about 1,000 tokens in and 500 tokens back, that is about $1.75 for Claude Opus 4.7 and $12 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
Which can read longer documents, Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.7 has a context window of 1M tokens and GPT-5.4 Pro has 1.1M tokens.

Where this data comes from

  • Epoch AI: Benchmark data: Epoch AI, 'Capabilities & benchmarking', epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0). We match models across sources, rank them and show them in charts. Scores are not changed. Epoch AI does not endorse this site.
  • Arena (formerly LMArena): Human-preference ratings: Arena (arena.ai) leaderboard dataset, CC BY 4.0. We keep the latest published ratings, match them to models from other sources and rank them. Ratings are not changed. Arena does not endorse this site.
  • LiteLLM model price list: Prices and context windows: LiteLLM model price list (github.com/BerriAI/litellm, MIT licence). We use the model maker's own price entry when there is one. Prices change often, so always confirm on the maker's site before you buy.

Newest data on this page: 26 Oct 2026. Prices are list prices and change often, so confirm on the maker's site before you buy. Sponsors never change a score or an order. How we calculate this · Report a mistake

We use optional cookies for analytics and referral tracking. Learn more about our privacy policy