AI Rankings
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.3: Scores, Price and Which to Choose
Data updated
Read the model pages for the full picture: Claude Opus 4.7 and Muse Spark 1.3.
Side by side
- Claude Opus 4.7
- Muse Spark 1.3
- Epoch Capabilities IndexToo close to call
Combined score over many tests. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Claude Opus 4.7:156.8Muse Spark 1.3:157.2 - Arena text ratingToo close to call
Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Claude Opus 4.7:1501Muse Spark 1.3:1496 - Arena coding ratingToo close to call
Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Claude Opus 4.7:1551Muse Spark 1.3:1536 - Arena web development ratingMuse Spark 1.3 leads
Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Claude Opus 4.7:1558Muse Spark 1.3:Better: 1657 - Arena vision ratingToo close to call
Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Claude Opus 4.7:1299Muse Spark 1.3:1290 - FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Original, very hard maths problems written by mathematicians.
Claude Opus 4.7:70.2%Muse Spark 1.3:Better: 74.4% - OTIS Mock AIMEToo close to call
Maths competition problems in the style of the US AIME exam, from the 2024 and 2025 sets.
Claude Opus 4.7:97.8%Muse Spark 1.3:99.2% - Blended price per million tokensMuse Spark 1.3 costs less
Blended price: lower is better.
Claude Opus 4.7:$10.00Muse Spark 1.3:Better: $2.00 - Context windowToo close to call
How much text it can read at once.
Claude Opus 4.7:1M tokensMuse Spark 1.3:1M tokens
The numbers
| Measure | Claude Opus 4.7 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities IndexToo close to call | 156.8 | 157.2 |
| Arena text ratingToo close to call | 1501 | 1496 |
| Arena coding ratingToo close to call | 1551 | 1536 |
| Arena web development rating | 1558 | 1657 |
| Arena vision ratingToo close to call | 1299 | 1290 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 70.2% | 74.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIMEToo close to call | 97.8% | 99.2% |
| Blended price per million tokens | $10.00 | $2.00 |
| Context windowToo close to call | 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
What it costs in everyday terms
- 100 chats with Claude Opus 4.7
- $1.75
- Blended price $10.00 per million tokens.
- 100 chats with Muse Spark 1.3
- $0.34
- Blended price $2.00 per million tokens.
Who should pick which
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 if these matter most
It does not lead clearly on any measure we hold for both models.
Pick Muse Spark 1.3 if these matter most
- Arena web development rating: 1657 against 1558
- FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 74.4% against 70.2%
- Blended price per million tokens: $2.00 against $10.00
Too close to call: Epoch Capabilities Index, Arena text rating, Arena coding rating, Arena vision rating, OTIS Mock AIME, Context window.
Scores come from tests and votes, not from your own work. Try both on a task you care about before you commit.
Questions about this comparison
- Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Muse Spark 1.3?
- Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on 2 of 7 shared quality measures, Claude Opus 4.7 on 0. 5 measures are too close to call. Muse Spark 1.3 costs about 80% less than Claude Opus 4.7 on a blended price of $2.00 against $10.00 per million tokens. Which one is better for you depends on your task and budget, so test both on your own work.
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Muse Spark 1.3?
- Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper on blended price: $10.00 per million tokens for Claude Opus 4.7 against $2.00 for Muse Spark 1.3. For 100 chats of about 1,000 tokens in and 500 tokens back, that is about $1.75 for Claude Opus 4.7 and $0.34 for Muse Spark 1.3.
- Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 or Muse Spark 1.3?
- On Arena coding rating they are too close to call (1551 and 1536).
Where this data comes from
- Epoch AI: Benchmark data: Epoch AI, 'Capabilities & benchmarking', epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0). We match models across sources, rank them and show them in charts. Scores are not changed. Epoch AI does not endorse this site.
- Arena (formerly LMArena): Human-preference ratings: Arena (arena.ai) leaderboard dataset, CC BY 4.0. We keep the latest published ratings, match them to models from other sources and rank them. Ratings are not changed. Arena does not endorse this site.
- LiteLLM model price list: Prices and context windows: LiteLLM model price list (github.com/BerriAI/litellm, MIT licence). We use the model maker's own price entry when there is one. Prices change often, so always confirm on the maker's site before you buy.
Newest data on this page: 26 Oct 2026. Prices are list prices and change often, so confirm on the maker's site before you buy. Sponsors never change a score or an order. How we calculate this · Report a mistake