AI Rankings
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1: Scores, Price and Which to Choose
Data updated
Read the model pages for the full picture: Gemini 3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.1.
Side by side
- Gemini 3.1 Pro
- Muse Spark 1.1
- Epoch Capabilities IndexToo close to call
Combined score over many tests. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Gemini 3.1 Pro:155.3Muse Spark 1.1:154.1 - Arena text ratingToo close to call
Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Gemini 3.1 Pro:1487Muse Spark 1.1:1490 - Arena coding ratingMuse Spark 1.1 leads
Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Gemini 3.1 Pro:1522Muse Spark 1.1:Better: 1533 - Arena web development ratingMuse Spark 1.1 leads
Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Gemini 3.1 Pro:1447Muse Spark 1.1:Better: 1543 - Arena vision ratingToo close to call
Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Gemini 3.1 Pro:1280Muse Spark 1.1:1280 - DeepSWEMuse Spark 1.1 leads
Software engineering tasks scored as the share solved on the first try (pass@1), run with the open mini-SWE-agent setup.
Gemini 3.1 Pro:11.7%Muse Spark 1.1:Better: 53.3% - SimpleQA VerifiedGemini 3.1 Pro leads
Short factual questions that each have one correct answer.
Gemini 3.1 Pro:Better: 73.5%Muse Spark 1.1:57.8% - Blended price per million tokensMuse Spark 1.1 costs less
Blended price: lower is better.
Gemini 3.1 Pro:$4.50Muse Spark 1.1:Better: $2.00 - Context windowToo close to call
How much text it can read at once.
Gemini 3.1 Pro:1M tokensMuse Spark 1.1:1M tokens
The numbers
| Measure | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities IndexToo close to call | 155.3 | 154.1 |
| Arena text ratingToo close to call | 1487 | 1490 |
| Arena coding rating | 1522 | 1533 |
| Arena web development rating | 1447 | 1543 |
| Arena vision ratingToo close to call | 1280 | 1280 |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | 53.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | 57.8% |
| Blended price per million tokens | $4.50 | $2.00 |
| Context windowToo close to call | 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
What it costs in everyday terms
- 100 chats with Gemini 3.1 Pro
- $0.80
- Blended price $4.50 per million tokens.
- 100 chats with Muse Spark 1.1
- $0.34
- Blended price $2.00 per million tokens.
Who should pick which
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro if these matter most
- SimpleQA Verified: 73.5% against 57.8%
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if these matter most
- Arena coding rating: 1533 against 1522
- Arena web development rating: 1543 against 1447
- DeepSWE: 53.3% against 11.7%
- Blended price per million tokens: $2.00 against $4.50
Too close to call: Epoch Capabilities Index, Arena text rating, Arena vision rating, Context window.
Scores come from tests and votes, not from your own work. Try both on a task you care about before you commit.
Questions about this comparison
- Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?
- Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on 3 of 7 shared quality measures, Gemini 3.1 Pro on 1. 3 measures are too close to call. Muse Spark 1.1 costs about 56% less than Gemini 3.1 Pro on a blended price of $2.00 against $4.50 per million tokens. Which one is better for you depends on your task and budget, so test both on your own work.
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?
- Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper on blended price: $4.50 per million tokens for Gemini 3.1 Pro against $2.00 for Muse Spark 1.1. For 100 chats of about 1,000 tokens in and 500 tokens back, that is about $0.80 for Gemini 3.1 Pro and $0.34 for Muse Spark 1.1.
- Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?
- On Arena coding rating, Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher (1533 against 1522). One measure is not the whole picture, so check the full table above.
Where this data comes from
- Epoch AI: Benchmark data: Epoch AI, 'Capabilities & benchmarking', epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0). We match models across sources, rank them and show them in charts. Scores are not changed. Epoch AI does not endorse this site.
- Arena (formerly LMArena): Human-preference ratings: Arena (arena.ai) leaderboard dataset, CC BY 4.0. We keep the latest published ratings, match them to models from other sources and rank them. Ratings are not changed. Arena does not endorse this site.
- LiteLLM model price list: Prices and context windows: LiteLLM model price list (github.com/BerriAI/litellm, MIT licence). We use the model maker's own price entry when there is one. Prices change often, so always confirm on the maker's site before you buy.
Newest data on this page: 26 Oct 2026. Prices are list prices and change often, so confirm on the maker's site before you buy. Sponsors never change a score or an order. How we calculate this · Report a mistake