AI Rankings
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3: Scores, Price and Which to Choose
Data updated
Read the model pages for the full picture: Gemini 3.8 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3.
Side by side
- Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Muse Spark 1.3
- Epoch Capabilities IndexToo close to call
Combined score over many tests. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Gemini 3.8 Flash:157.4Muse Spark 1.3:157.2 - Arena text ratingToo close to call
Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Gemini 3.8 Flash:1496Muse Spark 1.3:1496 - Arena coding ratingToo close to call
Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Gemini 3.8 Flash:1528Muse Spark 1.3:1536 - Arena web development ratingMuse Spark 1.3 leads
Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Gemini 3.8 Flash:1585Muse Spark 1.3:Better: 1657 - Arena vision ratingToo close to call
Rating from head-to-head votes by people. Bar shows where it sits between the lowest and highest score we track.
Gemini 3.8 Flash:1291Muse Spark 1.3:1290 - FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Original, very hard maths problems written by mathematicians.
Gemini 3.8 Flash:68.4%Muse Spark 1.3:Better: 74.4% - OTIS Mock AIMEToo close to call
Maths competition problems in the style of the US AIME exam, from the 2024 and 2025 sets.
Gemini 3.8 Flash:98.9%Muse Spark 1.3:99.2% - Blended price per million tokensGemini 3.8 Flash costs less
Blended price: lower is better.
Gemini 3.8 Flash:Better: $1.50Muse Spark 1.3:$2.00 - Context windowToo close to call
How much text it can read at once.
Gemini 3.8 Flash:1M tokensMuse Spark 1.3:1M tokens
The numbers
| Measure | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities IndexToo close to call | 157.4 | 157.2 |
| Arena text ratingToo close to call | 1496 | 1496 |
| Arena coding ratingToo close to call | 1528 | 1536 |
| Arena web development rating | 1585 | 1657 |
| Arena vision ratingToo close to call | 1291 | 1290 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 68.4% | 74.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIMEToo close to call | 98.9% | 99.2% |
| Blended price per million tokens | $1.50 | $2.00 |
| Context windowToo close to call | 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
What it costs in everyday terms
- 100 chats with Gemini 3.8 Flash
- $0.26
- Blended price $1.50 per million tokens.
- 100 chats with Muse Spark 1.3
- $0.34
- Blended price $2.00 per million tokens.
Who should pick which
Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash if these matter most
- Blended price per million tokens: $1.50 against $2.00
Pick Muse Spark 1.3 if these matter most
- Arena web development rating: 1657 against 1585
- FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 74.4% against 68.4%
Too close to call: Epoch Capabilities Index, Arena text rating, Arena coding rating, Arena vision rating, OTIS Mock AIME, Context window.
Scores come from tests and votes, not from your own work. Try both on a task you care about before you commit.
Questions about this comparison
- Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Muse Spark 1.3?
- Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on 2 of 7 shared quality measures, Gemini 3.8 Flash on 0. 5 measures are too close to call. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs about 25% less than Muse Spark 1.3 on a blended price of $1.50 against $2.00 per million tokens. Which one is better for you depends on your task and budget, so test both on your own work.
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Muse Spark 1.3?
- Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper on blended price: $1.50 per million tokens for Gemini 3.8 Flash against $2.00 for Muse Spark 1.3. For 100 chats of about 1,000 tokens in and 500 tokens back, that is about $0.26 for Gemini 3.8 Flash and $0.34 for Muse Spark 1.3.
- Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Muse Spark 1.3?
- On Arena coding rating they are too close to call (1528 and 1536).
Where this data comes from
- Epoch AI: Benchmark data: Epoch AI, 'Capabilities & benchmarking', epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0). We match models across sources, rank them and show them in charts. Scores are not changed. Epoch AI does not endorse this site.
- Arena (formerly LMArena): Human-preference ratings: Arena (arena.ai) leaderboard dataset, CC BY 4.0. We keep the latest published ratings, match them to models from other sources and rank them. Ratings are not changed. Arena does not endorse this site.
- LiteLLM model price list: Prices and context windows: LiteLLM model price list (github.com/BerriAI/litellm, MIT licence). We use the model maker's own price entry when there is one. Prices change often, so always confirm on the maker's site before you buy.
Newest data on this page: 26 Oct 2026. Prices are list prices and change often, so confirm on the maker's site before you buy. Sponsors never change a score or an order. How we calculate this · Report a mistake