Skip to main content

AI Rankings

GPT-5.1: Score, Price and Context Window

Where GPT-5.1 from OpenAI ranks, what it costs and how much text it can read, in plain numbers with the sources.

Data updated

  • OpenAI
  • Closed weights
  • Released Nov 2025

Its score range overlaps with GLM-5.1, the model just above it, so a small gap in rank is not a meaningful difference.

Key facts

Overall score
149.8
Rank 63 of 270. Likely range 148.4 to 151.7.
Human preference: chat
1456
Rank 58 of 166. 41,646 votes, at the "High" setting.
Human preference: coding
1492
Rank 72 of 166. 8,408 votes, at the "High" setting.
Human preference: web pages
1396
Rank 71 of 85. 4,914 votes, at the "Medium" setting.
Human preference: images
1251
Rank 43 of 85. 9,848 votes, at the "High" setting.
Price per million tokens
$1.25 in / $10.00 out
Blended $3.44. Cached input $0.13. List price from OpenAI, checked 26 Oct 2026.
Context window
272K tokens
About 204,000 words at once. One answer up to 128K tokens.
Weights
Closed
Used through the maker's apps or API (Epoch AI: API access).

Features listed by the price list: Image input, PDF input, Tool use, Reasoning, Web search, Prompt caching, Structured output.

How GPT-5.1 stacks up

Each strip shows every model we track as faint bars. The dot is this model. Better is always to the right, even for price.
GPT-5.1 compared with all models we trackOverall capability: 149.8. Better than 76% of the other 269 models. Human preference: chat: 1456. Better than 64% of the other 165 models. Human preference: coding: 1492. Better than 56% of the other 165 models. Human preference: web pages: 1396. Better than 16% of the other 84 models. Human preference: images: 1251. Better than 50% of the other 84 models. Price: $3.44 per 1M. Cheaper than 27% of the other 200 priced models. Context window: 272K tokens. Larger context window than 61% of the other 198 models.
  • Overall capability149.8

    Better than 76% of the other 269 modelsTop 25%

    Epoch Capabilities Index: one score that combines many tests.

  • Human preference: chat1456

    Better than 64% of the other 165 modelsUpper half

    How often people pick its answers over another model's on Arena.

  • Human preference: coding1492

    Better than 56% of the other 165 modelsUpper half

    How often people pick its answers to coding questions on Arena.

  • Human preference: web pages1396

    Better than 16% of the other 84 models

    How often people pick the web pages and small apps it builds on Arena.

  • Human preference: images1251

    Better than 50% of the other 84 modelsUpper half

    How often people pick its answers about pictures on Arena.

  • Price$3.44 per 1M

    Cheaper than 27% of the other 200 priced models

    Blended price per million tokens. Lower is better, so the cheapest models sit on the right.

  • Context window272K tokens

    Larger context window than 61% of the other 198 modelsUpper half

    How much text it can read at once. Bigger suits long documents.

Compared with the other published models that have each measure. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

Test results

Each test checks one kind of skill. Place shows where it stands among the models that took that test.
  • GPQA Diamond

    Very hard multiple-choice science questions in biology, physics and chemistry, written by experts and designed so a quick web search does not give the answer.

  • Terminal-Bench

    Tasks done in a computer terminal, such as setting up software or fixing a broken build, checked by automatic tests. Scores here use the benchmark's standard reference agent so models are compared on the same footing.

  • OTIS Mock AIME

    Maths competition problems in the style of the US AIME exam, from the 2024 and 2025 sets. Every answer is a whole number.

    88.6%

    Place 64 of 174

  • SimpleQA Verified

    Short factual questions that each have one correct answer. It measures how often a model gets facts right.

  • SimpleBench

    Everyday common-sense and trick questions that most people answer correctly but AI models often get wrong.

    53.2%

    Place 34 of 80

    tied with 1 other

  • Humanity's Last Exam

    A large set of very hard, expert-written questions across many subjects, built to stay difficult for top AI models.

  • ARC-AGI-2

    Visual puzzles where the AI must work out a new rule from a few examples and apply it. They test picking up a new idea quickly, not recalling facts.

  • SWE-bench Verified

    Real bug reports from open-source software projects. The AI has to change the code so the project's own tests pass. The tasks were checked by people.

What it costs in everyday terms

List prices turned into amounts you can picture. Real bills depend on how you use it.
100 chats
$0.63
Cost of 100 chats assumes each chat sends 1,000 tokens (about 750 words) and gets 500 tokens (about 375 words) back.
A 300-page book
$0.13
Cost to read a 300-page book assumes about 100,000 input tokens and no reply. A real book varies with page size and language.
Blended price
$3.44 per 1M
Three parts input to one part output. Our own calculation for comparing models.

Assumptions: 100 chats of about 1,000 tokens in and 500 tokens back. a 300-page book of about 100,000 tokens, read once with no reply.

Questions about GPT-5.1

How much does GPT-5.1 cost?
GPT-5.1 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens, using the list price from OpenAI as of 26 Oct 2026. That is about $0.63 for 100 chats of about 1,000 tokens in and 500 tokens back. Confirm on the maker's site before you buy, because prices change.
What is the context window of GPT-5.1?
GPT-5.1 has a context window of 272K tokens, roughly 204,000 words of text read at once. A single answer can be up to 128K tokens long.
Is GPT-5.1 open source?
We list GPT-5.1 as closed: it is used through its maker's apps or API and its weights are not published (Epoch AI lists its access as "API access").
How good is GPT-5.1 compared with other AI models?
On the Epoch Capabilities Index, GPT-5.1 scores 149.8 (likely range 148.4 to 151.7), which ranks 63 of 270 models we track. On Arena's human-vote text board it is ranked 58 of 166. Scores close together are a tie in practice.
How does GPT-5.1 compare with GLM-5.1?
GLM-5.1 scores higher on 6 of 9 shared quality measures, GPT-5.1 on 1. 2 measures are too close to call. GLM-5.1 costs about 37% less than GPT-5.1 on a blended price of $2.15 against $3.44 per million tokens. See the full comparison for every measure.
How current are these numbers for GPT-5.1?
The newest data on this page is dated 26 Oct 2026. Scores come from Epoch AI and Arena, prices from the open LiteLLM price list.

Where this data comes from

  • Epoch AI: Benchmark data: Epoch AI, 'Capabilities & benchmarking', epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0). We match models across sources, rank them and show them in charts. Scores are not changed. Epoch AI does not endorse this site.
  • Arena (formerly LMArena): Human-preference ratings: Arena (arena.ai) leaderboard dataset, CC BY 4.0. We keep the latest published ratings, match them to models from other sources and rank them. Ratings are not changed. Arena does not endorse this site.
  • LiteLLM model price list: Prices and context windows: LiteLLM model price list (github.com/BerriAI/litellm, MIT licence). We use the model maker's own price entry when there is one. Prices change often, so always confirm on the maker's site before you buy.

Newest data on this page: 26 Oct 2026. Prices are list prices and change often, so confirm on the maker's site before you buy. Sponsors never change a score or an order. How we calculate this · Report a mistake

We use optional cookies for analytics and referral tracking. Learn more about our privacy policy