Skip to main content

AI Rankings

Grok 4.6: Score, Price and Context Window

Where Grok 4.6 from xAI ranks, what it costs and how much text it can read, in plain numbers with the sources.

Data updated

  • xAI
  • Closed weights
  • Released Aug 2026

Its score range overlaps with GPT-6 Luna, the model just above it, so a small gap in rank is not a meaningful difference.

Key facts

Overall score
156.6
Rank 28 of 270. Likely range 154.7 to 159.2.
Human preference: chat
1456
Rank 56 of 166. 32,189 votes, at the "High" setting.
Human preference: coding
1510
Rank 50 of 166. 7,973 votes, at the "High" setting.
Human preference: web pages
1617
Rank 19 of 85. 11,022 votes, at the "High" setting.
Human preference: images
1262
Rank 36 of 85. 7,261 votes, at the "High" setting.
Price per million tokens
$2.00 in / $6.00 out
Blended $3.00. Cached input $0.50. List price from xAI, checked 26 Oct 2026.
Context window
500K tokens
About 375,000 words at once. One answer up to 500K tokens.
Weights
Closed
Used through the maker's apps or API (Epoch AI: API access).

Features listed by the price list: Image input, Tool use, Reasoning, Web search, Prompt caching, Structured output.

How Grok 4.6 stacks up

Each strip shows every model we track as faint bars. The dot is this model. Better is always to the right, even for price.
Grok 4.6 compared with all models we trackOverall capability: 156.6. Better than 89% of the other 269 models. Human preference: chat: 1456. Better than 66% of the other 165 models. Human preference: coding: 1510. Better than 70% of the other 165 models. Human preference: web pages: 1617. Better than 78% of the other 84 models. Human preference: images: 1262. Better than 58% of the other 84 models. Price: $3.00 per 1M. Cheaper than 29% of the other 200 priced models. Context window: 500K tokens. Larger context window than 66% of the other 198 models.
  • Overall capability156.6

    Better than 89% of the other 269 modelsTop 25%

    Epoch Capabilities Index: one score that combines many tests.

  • Human preference: chat1456

    Better than 66% of the other 165 modelsUpper half

    How often people pick its answers over another model's on Arena.

  • Human preference: coding1510

    Better than 70% of the other 165 modelsUpper half

    How often people pick its answers to coding questions on Arena.

  • Human preference: web pages1617

    Better than 78% of the other 84 modelsTop 25%

    How often people pick the web pages and small apps it builds on Arena.

  • Human preference: images1262

    Better than 58% of the other 84 modelsUpper half

    How often people pick its answers about pictures on Arena.

  • Price$3.00 per 1M

    Cheaper than 29% of the other 200 priced models

    Blended price per million tokens. Lower is better, so the cheapest models sit on the right.

  • Context window500K tokens

    Larger context window than 66% of the other 198 modelsUpper half

    How much text it can read at once. Bigger suits long documents.

Compared with the other published models that have each measure. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

Test results

Each test checks one kind of skill. Place shows where it stands among the models that took that test.
  • GPQA Diamond

    Very hard multiple-choice science questions in biology, physics and chemistry, written by experts and designed so a quick web search does not give the answer.

    94.0%

    Place 11 of 183

    tied with 1 other

  • SimpleBench

    Everyday common-sense and trick questions that most people answer correctly but AI models often get wrong.

  • OTIS Mock AIME

    Maths competition problems in the style of the US AIME exam, from the 2024 and 2025 sets. Every answer is a whole number.

    99.2%

    Place 16 of 174

    tied with 1 other

  • ARC-AGI-2

    Visual puzzles where the AI must work out a new rule from a few examples and apply it. They test picking up a new idea quickly, not recalling facts.

  • DeepSWE

    Software engineering tasks scored as the share solved on the first try (pass@1), run with the open mini-SWE-agent setup.

  • SimpleQA Verified

    Short factual questions that each have one correct answer. It measures how often a model gets facts right.

  • FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)

    Original, very hard maths problems written by mathematicians. Each has an exact answer and the problems are kept private so models cannot have memorised them. This is the Tiers 1 to 3 set, version 2.

    66.0%

    Place 32 of 87

    tied with 1 other

What it costs in everyday terms

List prices turned into amounts you can picture. Real bills depend on how you use it.
100 chats
$0.50
Cost of 100 chats assumes each chat sends 1,000 tokens (about 750 words) and gets 500 tokens (about 375 words) back.
A 300-page book
$0.20
Cost to read a 300-page book assumes about 100,000 input tokens and no reply. A real book varies with page size and language.
Blended price
$3.00 per 1M
Three parts input to one part output. Our own calculation for comparing models.

Assumptions: 100 chats of about 1,000 tokens in and 500 tokens back. a 300-page book of about 100,000 tokens, read once with no reply.

Questions about Grok 4.6

How much does Grok 4.6 cost?
Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens, using the list price from xAI as of 26 Oct 2026. That is about $0.50 for 100 chats of about 1,000 tokens in and 500 tokens back. Confirm on the maker's site before you buy, because prices change.
What is the context window of Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 has a context window of 500K tokens, roughly 375,000 words of text read at once. A single answer can be up to 500K tokens long.
Is Grok 4.6 open source?
We list Grok 4.6 as closed: it is used through its maker's apps or API and its weights are not published (Epoch AI lists its access as "API access").
How good is Grok 4.6 compared with other AI models?
On the Epoch Capabilities Index, Grok 4.6 scores 156.6 (likely range 154.7 to 159.2), which ranks 28 of 270 models we track. On Arena's human-vote text board it is ranked 56 of 166. Scores close together are a tie in practice.
How does Grok 4.6 compare with GPT-5.6 Luna?
Grok 4.6 scores higher on 5 of 12 shared quality measures, GPT-5.6 Luna on 1. 6 measures are too close to call. GPT-5.6 Luna costs about 85% less than Grok 4.6 on a blended price of $0.45 against $3.00 per million tokens. See the full comparison for every measure.
How current are these numbers for Grok 4.6?
The newest data on this page is dated 26 Oct 2026. Scores come from Epoch AI and Arena, prices from the open LiteLLM price list.

Where this data comes from

  • Epoch AI: Benchmark data: Epoch AI, 'Capabilities & benchmarking', epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0). We match models across sources, rank them and show them in charts. Scores are not changed. Epoch AI does not endorse this site.
  • Arena (formerly LMArena): Human-preference ratings: Arena (arena.ai) leaderboard dataset, CC BY 4.0. We keep the latest published ratings, match them to models from other sources and rank them. Ratings are not changed. Arena does not endorse this site.
  • LiteLLM model price list: Prices and context windows: LiteLLM model price list (github.com/BerriAI/litellm, MIT licence). We use the model maker's own price entry when there is one. Prices change often, so always confirm on the maker's site before you buy.

Newest data on this page: 26 Oct 2026. Prices are list prices and change often, so confirm on the maker's site before you buy. Sponsors never change a score or an order. How we calculate this · Report a mistake

We use optional cookies for analytics and referral tracking. Learn more about our privacy policy