How much does Qwen2.5-Max cost?

We do not hold a list price for Qwen2.5-Max yet, so we cannot compare its cost. Check the maker's own price page.

Is Qwen2.5-Max open source?

We list Qwen2.5-Max as closed: it is used through its maker's apps or API and its weights are not published (Epoch AI lists its access as "API access").

How good is Qwen2.5-Max compared with other AI models?

On the Epoch Capabilities Index, Qwen2.5-Max scores 132.5 (likely range 128.6 to 135.5), which ranks 153 of 270 models we track. On Arena's human-vote text board it is ranked 117 of 166. Scores close together are a tie in practice.

How does Qwen2.5-Max compare with DeepSeek-V3?

On quality, neither model leads clearly across the 6 measures both have. 4 measures are too close to call. See the full comparison for every measure.

How current are these numbers for Qwen2.5-Max?

The newest data on this page is dated 26 Oct 2026. Scores come from Epoch AI and Arena, prices from the open LiteLLM price list.

AI Rankings

Qwen2.5-Max: Score, Price and Context Window

Where Qwen2.5-Max from Alibaba ranks, what it costs and how much text it can read, in plain numbers with the sources.

Data updated 26 Oct 2026

Alibaba
Closed weights
Released Jan 2025

Its score range overlaps with Magistral Small 1.0, the model just above it, so a small gap in rank is not a meaningful difference.

Key facts

Overall score: 132.5; Rank 153 of 270. Likely range 128.6 to 135.5.
Human preference: chat: 1374; Rank 117 of 166. 32,487 votes.
Human preference: coding: 1401; Rank 119 of 166. 5,089 votes.
Weights: Closed; Used through the maker's apps or API (Epoch AI: API access).

We do not have a list price and a context window size for Qwen2.5-Max yet. It is shown as "Not measured" rather than guessed.

Try itQwen Studio in our AI tools directoryQwen assistant for chat, document processing, multimodal questions, web search, and creative tasks.

How Qwen2.5-Max stacks up

Each strip shows every model we track as faint bars. The dot is this model. Better is always to the right, even for price.

Qwen2.5-Max compared with all models we trackOverall capability: 132.5. Better than 43% of the other 269 models. Human preference: chat: 1374. Better than 29% of the other 165 models. Human preference: coding: 1401. Better than 28% of the other 165 models.

Overall capability132.5
Better than 43% of the other 269 models
Epoch Capabilities Index: one score that combines many tests.
Human preference: chat1374
Better than 29% of the other 165 models
How often people pick its answers over another model's on Arena.
Human preference: coding1401
Better than 28% of the other 165 models
How often people pick its answers to coding questions on Arena.

Compared with the other published models that have each measure. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

Where Qwen2.5-Max ranks

Leaderboards it appears on, best placing first.

See all leaderboards

Test results

Each test checks one kind of skill. Place shows where it stands among the models that took that test.

GPQA Diamond
Very hard multiple-choice science questions in biology, physics and chemistry, written by experts and designed so a quick web search does not give the answer.
56.1%
Place 127 of 183
OTIS Mock AIME
Maths competition problems in the style of the US AIME exam, from the 2024 and 2025 sets. Every answer is a whole number.
16.1%
Place 133 of 174
Aider Polyglot
225 coding exercises in six programming languages. The AI edits the code files and the exercise's tests decide pass or fail.
21.8%
Place 38 of 46

Similar models

Models from other makers with a similar overall score.

Learn more

Questions about Qwen2.5-Max

How much does Qwen2.5-Max cost?: We do not hold a list price for Qwen2.5-Max yet, so we cannot compare its cost. Check the maker's own price page.
Is Qwen2.5-Max open source?: We list Qwen2.5-Max as closed: it is used through its maker's apps or API and its weights are not published (Epoch AI lists its access as "API access").
How good is Qwen2.5-Max compared with other AI models?: On the Epoch Capabilities Index, Qwen2.5-Max scores 132.5 (likely range 128.6 to 135.5), which ranks 153 of 270 models we track. On Arena's human-vote text board it is ranked 117 of 166. Scores close together are a tie in practice.
How does Qwen2.5-Max compare with DeepSeek-V3?: On quality, neither model leads clearly across the 6 measures both have. 4 measures are too close to call. See the full comparison for every measure.
How current are these numbers for Qwen2.5-Max?: The newest data on this page is dated 26 Oct 2026. Scores come from Epoch AI and Arena, prices from the open LiteLLM price list.

Where this data comes from

Epoch AI: Benchmark data: Epoch AI, 'Capabilities & benchmarking', epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0). We match models across sources, rank them and show them in charts. Scores are not changed. Epoch AI does not endorse this site.
Arena (formerly LMArena): Human-preference ratings: Arena (arena.ai) leaderboard dataset, CC BY 4.0. We keep the latest published ratings, match them to models from other sources and rank them. Ratings are not changed. Arena does not endorse this site.

Newest data on this page: 26 Oct 2026. Prices are list prices and change often, so confirm on the maker's site before you buy. Sponsors never change a score or an order. How we calculate this · Report a mistake