Skip to main content
Back to discovery
🧩
PaidInformation reviewed 2026-10-15

Manus

Visit Website

About this listing

Product and access model reviewed from current official sources; workflow and example are editorial suggestions, not a hands-on test.

Official source

General AI agent for in-depth research, websites, slides and wide multi-item research, with credit-based plans from $20 a month.

Best suited to

Manus suits people who want to hand a multi-step task to an agent and get a finished piece of work back, such as a research summary, a website or a slide deck.

Meet Manus

Manus suits people who want to hand a multi-step task to an agent and get a finished piece of work back, such as a research summary, a website or a slide deck. Its Wide Research feature spreads one request across many items. Credits are the main cost control, so start with a small task and watch how many credits it uses.

A practical workflow

  1. Pick one bounded task with a result you can check
  2. Run it and read how the agent worked
  3. Compare the output with your own sources
  4. Scale up to Wide Research or scheduled tasks once credit use is clear

Illustrative input

This example describes a task, not a tested output. Adjust the source material and settings to your own situation.

Research five competitors of a small bakery, compare their prices in a table and draft a three-slide summary.

Result check: Open the cited sources, check the numbers in the table and confirm the slides match your brief.

Access and alternatives

The pricing page lists three paid plans: $20 a month with 4,000 credits, $40 with a customizable 8,000 credits, and $200 with 40,000 credits. Each includes 300 refresh credits every day, 20 concurrent tasks and 20 scheduled tasks, and annual billing saves 17%. No free plan appears on the page, and Team and Enterprise plans are separate.

Choose another workflow when its emphasis fits better: Lindy for no-code assistant workflows; Browser Use for an open-source browser agent; ChatGPT for a general assistant with agent features.

Illustrative workspace photo
Illustrative stock photo from Unsplash; not a screenshot of Manus.

What you can do

In-depth research for everyday and large-scale tasks

Professional website creation

Slide generation

Wide Research for scaling a task across many items

Early access to beta features

Team plan, SSO and API for business use

Where it helps

  • Handles research, websites and slides in one place
  • Daily refresh credits on every plan
  • Business options with team plan and SSO

What to consider

  • No free plan is listed on the pricing page
  • Credit use depends on the task, so costs can vary

Pricing & free access

Official pricing
Paid

The pricing page lists three paid plans: $20 a month with 4,000 credits, $40 with a customizable 8,000 credits, and $200 with 40,000 credits. Each includes 300 refresh credits every day, 20 concurrent tasks and 20 scheduled tasks, and annual billing saves 17%. No free plan appears on the page, and Team and Enterprise plans are separate.

Plan information can change. Prices and conditions are set by the provider. Information checked 2026-10-15.

Source for access details

Weekly AI tool changes in AI Agents & Workflows

One email a week with pricing and feature changes in this category. No per-tool price alerts.

Questions about Manus

Who is Manus useful for?

Manus suits people who want to hand a multi-step task to an agent and get a finished piece of work back, such as a research summary, a website or a slide deck. Its Wide Research feature spreads one request across many items. Credits are the main cost control, so start with a small task and watch how many credits it uses.

Does Manus have continuing free access?

The pricing page lists three paid plans: $20 a month with 4,000 credits, $40 with a customizable 8,000 credits, and $200 with 40,000 credits. Each includes 300 refresh credits every day, 20 concurrent tasks and 20 scheduled tasks, and annual billing saves 17%. No free plan appears on the page, and Team and Enterprise plans are separate.

How should I start a small evaluation?

Pick one bounded task with a result you can check Run it and read how the agent worked

What should I check in the result?

Open the cited sources, check the numbers in the table and confirm the slides match your brief.

When should I choose a different workflow?

Lindy for no-code assistant workflows; Browser Use for an open-source browser agent; ChatGPT for a general assistant with agent features.

Did this help you complete your task?

Tell us what needs improving. No account or private output required.

Was this useful?
Report incorrect information or a broken link

Review evidence

Documentation-based review · 2026-10-15

Reviewed from the linked official documentation. The workflow and example are editorial suggestions; no account-level product test or measured performance comparison was performed.

Other tools to consider

Explore all tools

Browser Use provides an open-source browser-agent framework and hosted browser services.

Best for: AI browser agents for controlled web tasks

AI Agents & WorkflowsBrowser & Computer Automation

AI teammate for connected company tasks, including research, email, meetings, CRM updates, and computer-based work.

Best for: Connected app tasks and Research

AI Agents & WorkflowsProductivity & Automation

OpenAI's AI assistant for writing, coding, research, file analysis, and connected work across chats and projects.

Best for: Writing, research, coding, and file-based tasks in one assistant

Chatbots & Assistants

We use optional cookies for analytics and referral tracking. Learn more about our privacy policy