Skip to main content
Back to discovery
πŸ”Ž
Free plan + paidInformation reviewed 2026-10-15

Paperguide

Visit Website

About this listing

Product and access model reviewed from current official sources; workflow and example are editorial suggestions, not a hands-on test.

Official source

Search papers, chat with PDFs, manage references, and extract research data into structured tables.

Best suited to

Paperguide suits researchers moving from a reading question toward organized evidence and a cited draft.

Meet Paperguide

Paperguide suits researchers moving from a reading question toward organized evidence and a cited draft. Search, PDF conversations and extraction tables sit near the reference manager. Use a small collection first, with a defined extraction question. Generated summaries should retain the paper's scope; a neat table is not evidence that every cell was read correctly.

A practical workflow

  1. Define a narrow research question and locate relevant papers.
  2. Add permitted PDFs or reference records.
  3. Create a small extraction table with explicit fields.
  4. Check each cell against the original paper before synthesizing.

Illustrative input

This example describes a task, not a tested output. Adjust the source material and settings to your own situation.

For these papers, extract study population, intervention, outcome and follow-up period. Use not reported where a field is missing.

Result check: Verify each extracted value, citation and page context; distinguish absent information from a negative result.

Access and alternatives

A continuing Free plan includes monthly AI credits and restricted search, reference and extraction capacity. Paid plans expand tables, collaboration, reports and systematic-review features. Some extraction features are labelled coming soon; check availability rather than assuming every advertised workflow is already included.

Choose another workflow when its emphasis fits better: SciSpace for another paper-reading workflow; Elicit for a different structured evidence approach.

Illustrative workspace photo
Illustrative stock photo from Unsplash; not a screenshot of Paperguide.

What you can do

AI paper search

PDF conversations

Reference manager

Structured data extraction

Research reports

Where it helps

  • Reading and reference organization share a workspace
  • Explicit table fields make evidence easier to inspect
  • Monthly free credits allow small evaluations

What to consider

  • Free storage and extraction capacity are limited
  • Generated reports require source-level verification

Pricing & free access

Official pricing
Free plan + paid

A continuing Free plan includes monthly AI credits and restricted search, reference and extraction capacity. Paid plans expand tables, collaboration, reports and systematic-review features. Some extraction features are labelled coming soon; check availability rather than assuming every advertised workflow is already included.

Plan information can change. Prices and conditions are set by the provider. Information checked 2026-10-15.

Source for access details

Weekly AI tool changes in Research & Data

One email a week with pricing and feature changes in this category. No per-tool price alerts.

Questions about Paperguide

Who is Paperguide useful for?

Paperguide suits researchers moving from a reading question toward organized evidence and a cited draft. Search, PDF conversations and extraction tables sit near the reference manager. Use a small collection first, with a defined extraction question. Generated summaries should retain the paper's scope; a neat table is not evidence that every cell was read correctly.

Does Paperguide have continuing free access?

A continuing Free plan includes monthly AI credits and restricted search, reference and extraction capacity. Paid plans expand tables, collaboration, reports and systematic-review features. Some extraction features are labelled coming soon; check availability rather than assuming every advertised workflow is already included.

How should I start a small evaluation?

Define a narrow research question and locate relevant papers. Add permitted PDFs or reference records.

What should I check in the result?

Verify each extracted value, citation and page context; distinguish absent information from a negative result.

When should I choose a different workflow?

SciSpace for another paper-reading workflow; Elicit for a different structured evidence approach.

Did this help you complete your task?

Tell us what needs improving. No account or private output required.

Was this useful?
Report incorrect information or a broken link

Review evidence

Documentation-based review Β· 2026-10-15

Reviewed from the linked official documentation. The workflow and example are editorial suggestions; no account-level product test or measured performance comparison was performed.

Other tools to consider

Explore all tools

AI research workspace for exploring papers, chatting with PDFs, extracting information, and developing literature reviews.

Best for: Paper discovery and PDF questions

Research & DataEducation & Learning

Research assistant for finding papers, extracting evidence, synthesising findings, and structured literature-review workflows.

Best for: Finding and structuring evidence from research papers

Research & Data

AI analytics workspace with agentic notebooks, conversational data exploration and shareable data apps.

Best for: Hex suits analysts and data teams that want one workspace for SQL, Python, AI-assisted exploration and interactive apps.

Research & DataProductivity & Automation

We use optional cookies for analytics and referral tracking. Learn more about our privacy policy