QA a Vibe-Coded App Before Sharing It
Plan manual QA for an AI-built app for makers in ChatGPT: prioritized tests for empty states, bad input, failed requests and narrow screens.
Make it yours
Fill in the inputs. Your prompt updates as you type.
Your prompt
Review a small AI-assisted app before I share it.
App purpose: {{purpose}}
Main user flows: {{flows}}
Stack and repository notes: {{stack}}
Known issues: {{known issues}}
Make a prioritized manual test plan covering empty states, invalid inputs, failed requests, keyboard access, narrow screens and saved-data persistence. For each test, state setup, action, expected result and severity if broken. Separate confirmed defects from untested risks. Do not claim to have inspected code or executed tests unless you actually did. Finish with a short release checklist and the smallest fixes for any confirmed blockers.4 inputs still blank. Empty inputs stay as placeholders when copied.
Get one tested prompt a week
One workflow, one prompt, one tool and one quality check by email. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
By subscribing you agree to receive this email from Genius Forges and to us storing your address to send it. We may ask you to confirm by email. Every email has an unsubscribe link. See our privacy policy.
Example result
Illustrative example; not tested on the listed platform. Example inputs are included in the response.
How to use this prompt
- 1Replace the input fields with your own context.
- 2Paste the personalized prompt into a compatible assistant.
- 3Check the output against your facts and refine one instruction at a time.
Tips & limitations
The example is an editorial illustration, not a claim of platform-specific testing. Results depend on your inputs and model. Review factual claims before publishing or acting. Compatible platforms were selected from provider documentation; the example has not been re-tested on every platform. Features may require the relevant generation mode or account plan. Quality check: Record actual observed pass/fail; do not claim tests were run from a checklist alone.
Explore collections
Did this help you complete your task?
Tell us what needs improving. No account or private output required.
Report incorrect information or a broken linkReview evidence
Illustrative example · 2026-10-07
Illustrative source inputs and reference outputs, not a recorded model benchmark. The example is an editorial illustration, not a claim of platform-specific testing. Results depend on your inputs and model. Review factual claims before publishing or acting. Compatible platforms were selected from provider documentation; the example has not been re-tested on every platform. Features may require the relevant generation mode or account plan. Quality check: Record actual observed pass/fail; do not claim tests were run from a checklist alone.