Skip to main content

AI Rankings

Claude Sonnet 5: Score, Price and Context Window

Where Claude Sonnet 5 from Anthropic ranks, what it costs and how much text it can read, in plain numbers with the sources.

Data updated

  • Anthropic
  • Closed weights
  • Released Jun 2026

Its score range overlaps with GPT-5.3 Codex, the model just above it, so a small gap in rank is not a meaningful difference.

Best for

  • Demanding tasks: its overall Epoch score is in the top 10% of models we track.
  • Very long documents: its context window is 1M tokens, roughly 750,000 words.

These lines are worked out from the numbers on this page, not from hands-on testing.

Key facts

Overall score
156.9
Rank 25 of 270. Likely range 154.1 to 159.7.
Human preference: chat
1462
Rank 50 of 166. 51,784 votes, at the "High" setting.
Human preference: coding
1520
Rank 32 of 166. 13,777 votes, at the "High" setting.
Human preference: web pages
1541
Rank 36 of 85. 16,187 votes, at the "High" setting.
Human preference: images
1262
Rank 37 of 85. 14,034 votes, at the "High" setting.
Price per million tokens
$2.00 in / $10.00 out
Blended $4.00. Cached input $0.20. List price from Anthropic, checked 26 Oct 2026.
Context window
1M tokens
About 750,000 words at once. One answer up to 128K tokens.
Weights
Closed
Used through the maker's apps or API (Epoch AI: API access).

Features listed by the price list: Image input, PDF input, Tool use, Reasoning, Web search, Prompt caching, Structured output.

How Claude Sonnet 5 stacks up

Each strip shows every model we track as faint bars. The dot is this model. Better is always to the right, even for price.
Claude Sonnet 5 compared with all models we trackOverall capability: 156.9. Better than 91% of the other 269 models. Human preference: chat: 1462. Better than 70% of the other 165 models. Human preference: coding: 1520. Better than 81% of the other 165 models. Human preference: web pages: 1541. Better than 58% of the other 84 models. Human preference: images: 1262. Better than 57% of the other 84 models. Price: $4.00 per 1M. Cheaper than 22% of the other 200 priced models. Context window: 1M tokens. Larger context window than 72% of the other 198 models.
  • Overall capability156.9

    Better than 91% of the other 269 modelsTop 10%

    Epoch Capabilities Index: one score that combines many tests.

  • Human preference: chat1462

    Better than 70% of the other 165 modelsUpper half

    How often people pick its answers over another model's on Arena.

  • Human preference: coding1520

    Better than 81% of the other 165 modelsTop 25%

    How often people pick its answers to coding questions on Arena.

  • Human preference: web pages1541

    Better than 58% of the other 84 modelsUpper half

    How often people pick the web pages and small apps it builds on Arena.

  • Human preference: images1262

    Better than 57% of the other 84 modelsUpper half

    How often people pick its answers about pictures on Arena.

  • Price$4.00 per 1M

    Cheaper than 22% of the other 200 priced models

    Blended price per million tokens. Lower is better, so the cheapest models sit on the right.

  • Context window1M tokens

    Larger context window than 72% of the other 198 modelsUpper half

    How much text it can read at once. Bigger suits long documents.

Compared with the other published models that have each measure. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

Test results

Each test checks one kind of skill. Place shows where it stands among the models that took that test.
  • GPQA Diamond

    Very hard multiple-choice science questions in biology, physics and chemistry, written by experts and designed so a quick web search does not give the answer.

    90.5%

    Place 37 of 183

    tied with 1 other

  • OTIS Mock AIME

    Maths competition problems in the style of the US AIME exam, from the 2024 and 2025 sets. Every answer is a whole number.

    94.7%

    Place 42 of 174

  • SimpleBench

    Everyday common-sense and trick questions that most people answer correctly but AI models often get wrong.

  • FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)

    Original, very hard maths problems written by mathematicians. Each has an exact answer and the problems are kept private so models cannot have memorised them. This is the Tiers 1 to 3 set, version 2.

    65.6%

    Place 34 of 87

    tied with 1 other

  • DeepSWE

    Software engineering tasks scored as the share solved on the first try (pass@1), run with the open mini-SWE-agent setup.

  • SimpleQA Verified

    Short factual questions that each have one correct answer. It measures how often a model gets facts right.

What it costs in everyday terms

List prices turned into amounts you can picture. Real bills depend on how you use it.
100 chats
$0.70
Cost of 100 chats assumes each chat sends 1,000 tokens (about 750 words) and gets 500 tokens (about 375 words) back.
A 300-page book
$0.20
Cost to read a 300-page book assumes about 100,000 input tokens and no reply. A real book varies with page size and language.
Blended price
$4.00 per 1M
Three parts input to one part output. Our own calculation for comparing models.

Assumptions: 100 chats of about 1,000 tokens in and 500 tokens back. a 300-page book of about 100,000 tokens, read once with no reply.

Questions about Claude Sonnet 5

How much does Claude Sonnet 5 cost?
Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens, using the list price from Anthropic as of 26 Oct 2026. That is about $0.70 for 100 chats of about 1,000 tokens in and 500 tokens back. Confirm on the maker's site before you buy, because prices change.
What is the context window of Claude Sonnet 5?
Claude Sonnet 5 has a context window of 1M tokens, roughly 750,000 words of text read at once. A single answer can be up to 128K tokens long.
Is Claude Sonnet 5 open source?
We list Claude Sonnet 5 as closed: it is used through its maker's apps or API and its weights are not published (Epoch AI lists its access as "API access").
How good is Claude Sonnet 5 compared with other AI models?
On the Epoch Capabilities Index, Claude Sonnet 5 scores 156.9 (likely range 154.1 to 159.7), which ranks 25 of 270 models we track. On Arena's human-vote text board it is ranked 50 of 166. Scores close together are a tie in practice.
How does Claude Sonnet 5 compare with GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna scores higher on 4 of 9 shared quality measures, Claude Sonnet 5 on 3. 2 measures are too close to call. GPT-6 Luna costs about 95% less than Claude Sonnet 5 on a blended price of $0.20 against $4.00 per million tokens. See the full comparison for every measure.
How current are these numbers for Claude Sonnet 5?
The newest data on this page is dated 26 Oct 2026. Scores come from Epoch AI and Arena, prices from the open LiteLLM price list.

Where this data comes from

  • Epoch AI: Benchmark data: Epoch AI, 'Capabilities & benchmarking', epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0). We match models across sources, rank them and show them in charts. Scores are not changed. Epoch AI does not endorse this site.
  • Arena (formerly LMArena): Human-preference ratings: Arena (arena.ai) leaderboard dataset, CC BY 4.0. We keep the latest published ratings, match them to models from other sources and rank them. Ratings are not changed. Arena does not endorse this site.
  • LiteLLM model price list: Prices and context windows: LiteLLM model price list (github.com/BerriAI/litellm, MIT licence). We use the model maker's own price entry when there is one. Prices change often, so always confirm on the maker's site before you buy.

Newest data on this page: 26 Oct 2026. Prices are list prices and change often, so confirm on the maker's site before you buy. Sponsors never change a score or an order. How we calculate this · Report a mistake

We use optional cookies for analytics and referral tracking. Learn more about our privacy policy