Skip to main content
Back to discovery
๐Ÿ’ป
Free plan + paidInformation reviewed 2026-10-15

Greptile

Visit Website

About this listing

Product and access model reviewed from current official sources; workflow and example are editorial suggestions, not a hands-on test.

Official source

AI code reviews that use a codebase graph to connect pull request changes with related files and team rules.

Best suited to

Greptile suits teams reviewing changes whose consequences extend beyond the edited lines.

Meet Greptile

Greptile suits teams reviewing changes whose consequences extend beyond the edited lines. Its codebase context links a pull request to related parts of the repository. Teams can set their review preferences and respond to comments in the code host, while choosing review levels that affect credit consumption.

A practical workflow

  1. Connect a supported code-host account and select a repository.
  2. Add concise rules for the change you want reviewed.
  3. Open a pull request and examine the contextual comments.
  4. Trace accepted findings into related files and rerun the relevant checks.

Illustrative input

This example describes a task, not a tested output. Adjust the source material and settings to your own situation.

Review this API response change for affected consumers elsewhere in the repository. Prefer compatibility issues over cosmetic suggestions.

Result check: Inspect the cited consumer code and verify that the alleged break occurs with the new response.

Access and alternatives

The recurring Starter plan is limited to one active developer and a monthly credit allowance. Paid plans expand team use and credits. Review intensity affects usage; enterprise self-hosting is a separate offering.

Choose another workflow when its emphasis fits better: GitHub Copilot for broader coding assistance; Augment Code for repository-context coding help.

Illustrative workspace photo
Illustrative stock photo from Unsplash; not a screenshot of Greptile.

What you can do

Codebase graph context

Pull request reviews

Custom review rules

Inline review comments

GitHub and GitLab integrations

Where it helps

  • Review can follow dependencies beyond the diff
  • Custom rules support a team's priorities
  • A recurring starter allowance enables small evaluations

What to consider

  • Free access is limited to one active developer
  • Different review levels consume different credits

Pricing & free access

Official pricing
Free plan + paid

The recurring Starter plan is limited to one active developer and a monthly credit allowance. Paid plans expand team use and credits. Review intensity affects usage; enterprise self-hosting is a separate offering.

Plan information can change. Prices and conditions are set by the provider. Information checked 2026-10-15.

Source for access details

Weekly AI tool changes in Coding & Development

One email a week with pricing and feature changes in this category. No per-tool price alerts.

Questions about Greptile

Who is Greptile useful for?

Greptile suits teams reviewing changes whose consequences extend beyond the edited lines. Its codebase context links a pull request to related parts of the repository. Teams can set their review preferences and respond to comments in the code host, while choosing review levels that affect credit consumption.

Does Greptile have continuing free access?

The recurring Starter plan is limited to one active developer and a monthly credit allowance. Paid plans expand team use and credits. Review intensity affects usage; enterprise self-hosting is a separate offering.

How should I start a small evaluation?

Connect a supported code-host account and select a repository. Add concise rules for the change you want reviewed.

What should I check in the result?

Inspect the cited consumer code and verify that the alleged break occurs with the new response.

When should I choose a different workflow?

GitHub Copilot for broader coding assistance; Augment Code for repository-context coding help.

Did this help you complete your task?

Tell us what needs improving. No account or private output required.

Was this useful?
Report incorrect information or a broken link

Review evidence

Documentation-based review ยท 2026-10-15

Reviewed from the linked official documentation. The workflow and example are editorial suggestions; no account-level product test or measured performance comparison was performed.

Other tools to consider

Explore all tools

Use codebase context and agent workflows to support software changes, review and verification.

Best for: Use codebase context and agent workflows to support software changes, review and verification.

Coding & Development

Free 14-minute unassisted coding diagnostic for JavaScript, TypeScript and Python, with paid practice drills for debugging and tracing.

Best for: Unrust is for developers who want to measure their own unassisted coding after leaning on AI assistants.

Education & LearningCoding & Development

We use optional cookies for analytics and referral tracking. Learn more about our privacy policy