Use codebase context and agent workflows to support software changes, review and verification.
Best for: Use codebase context and agent workflows to support software changes, review and verification.
About this listing
Product and access model reviewed from current official sources; workflow and example are editorial suggestions, not a hands-on test.
Official sourceAI code reviews that use a codebase graph to connect pull request changes with related files and team rules.
Best suited to
Greptile suits teams reviewing changes whose consequences extend beyond the edited lines.
Greptile suits teams reviewing changes whose consequences extend beyond the edited lines. Its codebase context links a pull request to related parts of the repository. Teams can set their review preferences and respond to comments in the code host, while choosing review levels that affect credit consumption.
This example describes a task, not a tested output. Adjust the source material and settings to your own situation.
Review this API response change for affected consumers elsewhere in the repository. Prefer compatibility issues over cosmetic suggestions.
Result check: Inspect the cited consumer code and verify that the alleged break occurs with the new response.
The recurring Starter plan is limited to one active developer and a monthly credit allowance. Paid plans expand team use and credits. Review intensity affects usage; enterprise self-hosting is a separate offering.
Choose another workflow when its emphasis fits better: GitHub Copilot for broader coding assistance; Augment Code for repository-context coding help.
Codebase graph context
Pull request reviews
Custom review rules
Inline review comments
GitHub and GitLab integrations
The recurring Starter plan is limited to one active developer and a monthly credit allowance. Paid plans expand team use and credits. Review intensity affects usage; enterprise self-hosting is a separate offering.
Plan information can change. Prices and conditions are set by the provider. Information checked 2026-10-15.
Source for access detailsOne email a week with pricing and feature changes in this category. No per-tool price alerts.
By subscribing you agree to receive this email from Genius Forges and to us storing your address to send it. We may ask you to confirm by email. Every email has an unsubscribe link. See our privacy policy.
Greptile suits teams reviewing changes whose consequences extend beyond the edited lines. Its codebase context links a pull request to related parts of the repository. Teams can set their review preferences and respond to comments in the code host, while choosing review levels that affect credit consumption.
The recurring Starter plan is limited to one active developer and a monthly credit allowance. Paid plans expand team use and credits. Review intensity affects usage; enterprise self-hosting is a separate offering.
Connect a supported code-host account and select a repository. Add concise rules for the change you want reviewed.
Inspect the cited consumer code and verify that the alleged break occurs with the new response.
GitHub Copilot for broader coding assistance; Augment Code for repository-context coding help.
Tell us what needs improving. No account or private output required.
Report incorrect information or a broken linkDocumentation-based review ยท 2026-10-15
Reviewed from the linked official documentation. The workflow and example are editorial suggestions; no account-level product test or measured performance comparison was performed.
Use codebase context and agent workflows to support software changes, review and verification.
Best for: Use codebase context and agent workflows to support software changes, review and verification.
GitHub's AI coding tools for editor assistance, agents, code review, and issue-to-pull-request workflows.
Best for: Coding assistance in an existing GitHub development workflow
Free 14-minute unassisted coding diagnostic for JavaScript, TypeScript and Python, with paid practice drills for debugging and tracing.
Best for: Unrust is for developers who want to measure their own unassisted coding after leaning on AI assistants.