Skip to main content
Back to discovery
๐Ÿ’ป
Free plan + paidInformation reviewed 2026-10-15

Sourcery

Visit Website

About this listing

Product and access model reviewed from current official sources; workflow and example are editorial suggestions, not a hands-on test.

Official source

AI pull request reviews, summaries, diagrams, and security checks for GitHub or GitLab repositories.

Best suited to

Sourcery suits teams that want review comments close to a pull request.

Meet Sourcery

Sourcery suits teams that want review comments close to a pull request. It combines summaries and change diagrams with suggestions and configurable review rules. The current offering extends beyond its earlier refactoring emphasis. Free public-repository access is distinct from paid private-repository review and broader team security scanning.

A practical workflow

  1. Install the supported code-host integration on an authorized repository.
  2. Set concise review rules and open a small pull request.
  3. Read the summary and inspect the comments against the diff.
  4. Accept justified fixes and run project checks before merging.

Illustrative input

This example describes a task, not a tested output. Adjust the source material and settings to your own situation.

Review this permission change for behavior that conflicts with our repository rules. Explain the affected path before proposing a fix.

Result check: Trace the reported issue through the code and verify any accepted fix with a meaningful test.

Access and alternatives

Public repository review is free on an ongoing basis. Private repositories require paid access after the time-limited trial. Nightly scans, team analytics, self-hosting and enterprise controls have separate plan boundaries.

Choose another workflow when its emphasis fits better: CodeRabbit for another repository-aware review workflow; Greptile for reviews centered on codebase context.

Illustrative workspace photo
Illustrative stock photo from Unsplash; not a screenshot of Sourcery.

What you can do

Pull request reviews

PR summaries and diagrams

Custom review rules

Suggested fixes

Pull request security checks

Where it helps

  • Reviews appear in the code-host workflow
  • Rules can reflect a team's conventions
  • Public projects have continuing free review access

What to consider

  • Private repository use is paid after the trial
  • Broader scanning and deployment controls are plan-dependent

Pricing & free access

Official pricing
Free plan + paid

Public repository review is free on an ongoing basis. Private repositories require paid access after the time-limited trial. Nightly scans, team analytics, self-hosting and enterprise controls have separate plan boundaries.

Plan information can change. Prices and conditions are set by the provider. Information checked 2026-10-15.

Source for access details

Weekly AI tool changes in Coding & Development

One email a week with pricing and feature changes in this category. No per-tool price alerts.

Questions about Sourcery

Who is Sourcery useful for?

Sourcery suits teams that want review comments close to a pull request. It combines summaries and change diagrams with suggestions and configurable review rules. The current offering extends beyond its earlier refactoring emphasis. Free public-repository access is distinct from paid private-repository review and broader team security scanning.

Does Sourcery have continuing free access?

Public repository review is free on an ongoing basis. Private repositories require paid access after the time-limited trial. Nightly scans, team analytics, self-hosting and enterprise controls have separate plan boundaries.

How should I start a small evaluation?

Install the supported code-host integration on an authorized repository. Set concise review rules and open a small pull request.

What should I check in the result?

Trace the reported issue through the code and verify any accepted fix with a meaningful test.

When should I choose a different workflow?

CodeRabbit for another repository-aware review workflow; Greptile for reviews centered on codebase context.

Did this help you complete your task?

Tell us what needs improving. No account or private output required.

Was this useful?
Report incorrect information or a broken link

Review evidence

Documentation-based review ยท 2026-10-15

Reviewed from the linked official documentation. The workflow and example are editorial suggestions; no account-level product test or measured performance comparison was performed.

Other tools to consider

Explore all tools

AI pull request reviews with repository context, team rules, and inline suggestions for developers.

Best for: CodeRabbit suits teams that want another review pass inside their existing pull request process.

Coding & Development

AI code reviews that use a codebase graph to connect pull request changes with related files and team rules.

Best for: Greptile suits teams reviewing changes whose consequences extend beyond the edited lines.

Coding & Development

Open-source local guardrail that checks AI coding agent tool calls, secret reads, MCP use and package installs before they run.

Best for: HOL Guard is for developers who let agents such as Claude Code, Codex or Cursor run commands on their machine.

Coding & DevelopmentAI Agents & Workflows

We use optional cookies for analytics and referral tracking. Learn more about our privacy policy